Volkswagen Eos Forum banner
1 - 20 of 23 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
Well, not just yet but the new Scirocco is FAN-bloody-TASTIC and I will definitely be selling my 2009 Eos come Spring :)

First impressions:

Outside: it was a white on black leather 2.0 TSi and looked stunning. Although white is supposed to be coming back into fashion in Europe, I still don't think I would take it, because it looks cheap (like ambulances and delivery vans here!).

The front (interior) is very similar to the Eos; possibly a couple of cm narrower and maybe a couple of cm lower (windscreen), but otherwise identical. The seats are more comfortable than the Eos' - better padding and slightly narrower, which means they hold you better in corners.

The rear is a bit claustrophobic, because the side windows are tiny (and don't open), but otherwise there's plenty of room. I am 6'2" and could fit easily into the rear, though my hair was just brushing the roof lining.

All in all, in terms of both appearance and dimensions, it's a LOT like the Eos inside, i.e. ample room in the front, adequate in the back. I quickly sat in an Audi TT immediately afterwards, but there's no comparison. The TT is TINY and I literally could not fit in the rear, even hunched up. Just two slight disappointments in the Scirocco: the sunroof tilts up, but doesn't open (a big downer after the Eos!!) and those weird boot hinges on the roof look as ungainly in person as they do in the photos.

Driving:

I drove the 200hp TSI with DSG 'box. It felt a LOT more lively than my 140hp Eos (obviously), though that was probably also because I know the local salesman well and he gave me the keys without coming with me. So, basically, I thrashed the car's nuts off ;)

It feels really composed and much lighter than the Eos (which it is, of course) and the DSG 'box has obviously been seriously tweaked since the one I had 3 years ago on my Golf Plus TDI. I could detect no trace of drivetrain shunt around town and in sport mode out on the open road it seemed very responsive.

Would I buy one today?

Well, no. Firstly because my Eos is only 3 1/2 months old and I would take a hammering financially, especially at this time of year when there is little demand for cabriolets. Secondly, I couldn't help thinking that 200hp isn't quite enough. Yes, it's a lot nippier than my TDI, but I reckon I will wait and see if they don't bring out a 225-250hp version a bit later. I would probably also opt for 4wd, as the car I tried did struggle for traction on occasions, though admittedly this was because I was driving like a lunatic (not dangerously, I hasten to add) ;)

Will I buy one sometime next year?

YES !!! :)

P.S. this was also my first time with one of VAG's proper sports steering wheels and I have to say that, although it looks as though it's been styled by Thrustmaster, it is really nice ti hold and on a par with the ///M wheel I had on my e90. It's nice and thick and all those bumpy bits are actually there for a purpose
 

· Registered
Joined
·
341 Posts
i too have tried the new scirocco
first off i think it looks as bad in the metal as it does in the photos.
i really like the front end but really, they should have done a better job of the rear. its basically a hatchback and not a very pretty one.
seriously, compared to the EOS its an ugly duckling which, is dissapointing as i would otherwise consider one
performance was only slightly up on my 2.0t and rear room is less and very clostrofobic. boot is also smaller
i did like the adjustable suspension though and the better standard spec level.
would i change from an EOS? no!. i think the new golf gti would be a better buy
 

· Registered
Joined
·
208 Posts
I have to agree, I think the Scirocco is a total disaster.

I have similar views to pacemaker. Look at the front from a low angle, head on and it looks really good.

The only nice thing about the interior is the adjustable suspension. When you sit inside the car you feel cramped, squashed and totally overwhelmed by the cramped conditions.

The rear view through the totally pointless headrests is abysmal to say the least.VW said they went for the style of headrests as they were retro and keeping the original style. I think that is utter pants. If VW put proper heade rests in you would not see a thing out the back.

I sat in the back and felt sick and cramped by the lack of space for my legs and head.

And the boot is hardly worth talking about.

I think the new VW Golf GTi is going to be stunning, that will wipe out the Scirocco.

On a differnt note I sat in the VW GTI Pirelli Edition, with the alcantara tyre tread style seats, dsg box, zenons,rcd510 and was super impressed. If I didnt have the EOS I would seriously consider either that of the passat cc, but thats another story.

I think I would miss the roof down experience.

Regards

Rob
 

· Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Interesting reactions. Just goes to show how we all look for different things in a car. All I can say is that driving the Eos after the Scirocco felt like being in a boring mid-size saloon car... Admittedly the weather is so bad at the moment that there's no advantage to having a convertible, but the Eos just isn't the sporty drive I had hoped for.
 

· Life is good... so far
Joined
·
1,232 Posts
It kind of depends on what you want. If you are looking for performance, an Eos isn't what you need. For that there's BMW (if you want a drop top) or a Scirocco or a GTI. Almost everything is a compromise anyway. You buy what you enjoy. If you have the money buy several......
 

· Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
You're right. The Eos is a very nice car; the main problem is that my previous vehicle was a 300hp RWD BMW and I'm kind of missing the performance :(
 

· Registered
Joined
·
208 Posts
I know what you mean, Ive had a couple of old M3's and they were superb.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
341 Posts
did you notice the scirocco has an even bigger gap between the tyres and arches?
on performance i revisited the new version of my previous car, a c180k 4 door sport, last week and coulldnt believe how flat and bumpy it was compared to the eos.
so horses for courses i think the eos is fast :)
so that rights off another merc cos to get the same poke i would have to spend serious dosh and same goes for bwm
if only they had stayed true to the original with the scirocco like the golf and beatle ie kept the couple styling as per the concepts
probably a cost thing?
fifth gear loved it and said it made the 3 door gti redundant
well the truth is they havnt sold anywhere near the first run if EOS's and my dealer says his order book is empty for the scirocco
anybody else think the rear looks like the previous colt?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
230 Posts
EOS is in a class of its own, it may not be the best looking of the group nor its power to weight ratio fantastic but it gives a good ride, comfortable and enough power (much more if u tweak the ecu kekeke) for daily commuting or raod trips.

Take note in Singapore's premiere Motoring mag, it was voted their choice of convertible. Only the 2.0TFSI is avail locally and the review is that its Golf GTI-alike power and DSG, with its unique roof (esp with the option of opening your sunroof), and the wonderful rear seating (that really seats 2 adults well), were given the thumbs up.

I dunno about the rest but I've had my fair share of driving the Miata, S2000, 350z etc, but none feels as 'roomy' nor 'comfortable' with the punch in a whole package :D

That of cos, if given the choice and loads of money, I'd dump that into a Lamborghini Murcielango anytime whahahahhahahaa :D :D :D
 

· senior member
Joined
·
1,129 Posts
FrEos, I'm not sure why you are looking for sporty performance in a your Eos when you opted for a diesel. The lively performance is mostly due to the turbo petrol engine. I'm sure that coloured your opinion more than the other aspects of the Scirroco. If you had gone for the TFSI and DSG combination I think you may have a different opinion. Just an observation from the other responsders rides.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
You're probably right. I did want the TFSI at the outset, but my dealer put me off by saying it would be very difficult to sell (in France). I'm actually glad I did go for the 'easy sell' option now, however, as I will be putting it on the market in the Spring.

I will definitely be getting the TFSI+DSG combo in the Scirocco!
 

· senior member
Joined
·
1,129 Posts
It may cost more but the TFSI +DSG makes it such a delight to drive, it is probably the best combo available irrespective of model.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
341 Posts
It may cost more but the TFSI +DSG makes it such a delight to drive, it is probably the best combo available irrespective of model.

i'll second that :D

a deisel may sell better in a normal car but a convertible??
like i have said before deisels are dead in VW, the 1.4 tsfi is the way to go if you really are that tight for cash
 

· Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
a deisel may sell better in a normal car but a convertible??

I chose the diesel because:

a. it's easier to sell and I change cars every 12 months
b. I'm a torque junky
c. it was supposed to be a long-distance cruiser

But

a. ok, on this point, I made the right choice (I hope)
b. 320Nm is ok, but 140hp in such a heavy car just isn't enough (my remapped 330d pushed out 300hp/640Nm)
c. there's too much wind noise, even with the roof up (B pillar) :(

Don't get me wrong, the Eos is a nice car, but it just doesn't feel as special as I had hoped. If we had more sunny days, though......
 

· Registered
Joined
·
341 Posts
have you considered remapping your EOS?
i too have noticed the wind noise at the top of the screen but thought it was there on the scirocco ans golf also and put it down to being usd to mercs and beemers
where is the b pillar :confused: sorry im dumb is that what your talking about?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
341 Posts
see 'what car' have given the scirocco the thumbs up against the bmw coupe but still have it as a poor mans TT
 

· Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter · #20 ·
I agree the TT is let down by the room - or lack of it - in the rear. The styling is also too aggressive for my tastes.

The B pillar is the one just behing your ear. The Eos doesn't have one and has to make do with a rubber seal on the rear window, hence the wind roar at speed :(
 
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top